A few days ago, we described how the Queensland Police Service Weapons Licensing Branch appears to frown on the occupational use of pistols by primary producers while the Queensland Police regularly euthanise animals with Glocks.
It isn’t just the Police that frown. The Police Minister has described farmers using pistols to deal with pests and stock as cowboys. How did we get here?
Fortunately, we can get some idea from documents obtained under Queensland’s Right To Information Act.
“if their proposed use isn’t supported then the applications are very unlikely to be successful”
At some point in the recent past, this document was prepared:
“I propose that all staff assessing or following up on new applications and renewals for Concealable Firearms be encouraged to speak to applicants to let them know that Cat H applications will be looked at on a case by case basis and if their proposed use isn’t supported then the applications are very unlikely to be successful.”
After assessment by the Licencing Coordinator, if the application is not supported, applicants will be offered the opportunity to withdraw prior to being rejected.
Some applications get very special attention. The document goes on:
“There cannot be a blanket NO answer for any type of licence, each one must be judged on its merits, however some of the standards points that have been referred to are listed below.
Why would each case need a special phone call where Branch staff members ‘speak to applicants’? Is it because some special attention is going to be delivered?
“Enjoy our new, improved, special attention”
In documents that appear to be scripts for the Branch members making the ‘special attention’ phone calls, we find these gems:
“The CSIRO and other Commonwealth and State agencies, including the Queensland Government, have produced a number of ‘Model Codes of Practice’ for the destruction of livestock and feral animals. These documents indicate that in most cases the use of rifles of sufficient calibres should be used for humane destruction of injured or sick beasts.
Publications on humane destruction of feral pest animals are not supportive of the use of handguns due to the smaller calibres used and the lack of accuracy over distance both of which can contribute to the suffering of an animal.”
It is hard to understand why pistol calibres are said to be smaller than rifle calibres. There are plenty of pistol calibres in common use which are larger than many common rifle calibres. Despite that, the Branch seem keen to give you the impression that there is absolutely no scientific support for using pistols to euthanise animals. There is no mention of the joint Queensland Police and Department of Primary Industries study at Warwick 16 years ago. That study endorsed the Police Service Glock and its .40 calibre projectile for euthanising cattle. There is even a Police procedure for euthanising animals with Glocks.
Undeterred by these difficult facts, the apparent script continues with its helpful suggestions:
“Other methods of carrying long arm rifles have been developed in recent years for both motorbike and horseback, including scabbards, gun racks and break down ‘survival’ type rifles of smaller size. This counters an argument that on rural properties it is not practical to travel distances with long arms.”
“Any rejection will need to be declared in future dealings with Weapons Licensing”
The most telling part of this apparent script is the implied consequence for the farmer or occupational shooter receiving the special attention:
“Please keep in mind that any rejection will need to be declared in future dealings with Weapons Licensing is it [sic: it is] a question on most forms used by Weapons Licensing.”
You sent the Queensland Police a form and some money. You’re trying to work livestock or dispatch pests in pretty difficult conditions. A policeman phones you and says “Thanks for your time today.” And after some waffle he indicates they won’t be “supporting” the renewal of your existing license. Then he tells you that you can withdraw your application and dispose of your pistol(s). Or you continue your application for renewal and very likely face formal refusal. He tells you to keep in mind that you’ll have to deal with us again. It sounds like they’re saying: we’re in a position of power over you and we will remember this.
Why no public release?
When documents like the apparent proposal and script above are released, they are normally put on the online Disclosure Log for anyone to access. They don’t seem to contain anything confidential or personal. At the time of publication, they weren’t available online in the Disclosure Log (see application RTI/18362).
Police comment invited
On Monday we invited the Queensland Police Service to comment on a draft of this post by close of business Thursday 13 October 2016. We have received none.
Written by A. Stanway
I have had numerous dealings with Vic police licensing service both personal and business
I had been an advocate for licensing and full disclosure up untill I was Robbed at gun point bashed and left to ring the police after they left
I found the police very objectionable they accused me of staging the robbery and I had 24 hours of interrogation both verbal and on video
then all my firearms were confiscated due to 2 parts of firearms found in my house as these had arrived after the robbery whilst I was recovering from the shock I placed them on a shelf
and forgot about them
I was given no relief or understanding
since then over 209 mistakes have been found with the recording of data in Victoria licensing computer
as far as I can say
DON’T TRUST THE POLICE
KEEP DETAILED RECORDS AS I HAVE TO PROVE YOUR SITUATION