Not one day removed from a similar vehicle attack in WA, another day in the glorious utopia of Victoria.
Paging Lisa Neville:
A NEIGHBOUR has described seeing a car “trying to run a guy over” in a Braybrook street where a man died in an attack involving a machete-wielding gang.
One man is dead and another fighting for life after the gang allegedly used their car as a weapon last night. Police are now hunting for the gang of thugs responsible for the altercation which happened around 9.30pm last night.
Police believe two men in their 40s were at Castley Crescent in Braybrook when they were allegedly set upon by a group of four to six men of African appearance. The group allegedly struck the two men with a car before they assaulted them with weapons including a machete.
The offenders allegedly fled the scene in a silver or grey hatchback car and struck both victims while leaving. The Herald Sun believes the car involved in the incident has been dumped in a nearby suburb.
A 44-year-old Braybrook man was taken to hospital with life threatening injuries, while a 40-year-old Braybrook man was also taken to hospital with life threatening injuries where he later died.
It is unknown whether the victims knew their alleged attackers.”
Note that a vehicle was once again used as a weapon but that doesn’t count because they “aren’t designed to kill”. Another moral superiority win.
More of the facts will come out in the wash, but what can you say really?
On face value, a gang of armed crooks kill a defenceless guy and seriously injure another and Police weren’t there in time to stop it. Their investigation won’t bring the deceased back to life and the Victorian judicial system will likely grant the offenders bail or give them a Community Corrections Order because something about a tough upbringing or whatever the local pro bono human rights’ lawyers concoct.
Will this guy’s family get fined $50,000 for being a victim of crime?
Sure, it’s easy to be cynical at this point but as we’ve said time and again, until the public demand access to appropriate self-defence tools this will continue to happen, no matter how much hubris and meaningless platitudes from the Police Commissioners and Police Ministers about “being safe” and “community safety” are trotted out.
This exchange could have been ended very swiftly with merely the presentation of a concealed firearm and the gang would have been on their way.
Instead, we have another two victims of Victoria’s crime wave and no answers as usual from Daniel Andrews or Lisa Neville.
Election when?
☞On face value, a gang of armed crooks kill a defenceless guy and seriously injure another and Police weren’t there in time to stop it ☜
it ain’t there “job” to stop it….
cops ain’t there to protect you (or: me!)
show me one HCA ruling which says they are……
(ain’t even part of their “standing orders”)
☞Their investigation won’t bring the deceased back to life and the Victorian judicial system will likely grant the offenders bail or give them a Community Corrections Order because something about a tough upbringing or whatever the local pro bono human rights’ lawyers concoct ☜
again…you miss the sub-text…..
these ☻ are being imported here as part of a deliberate policy of social disintegration;
its totally “deliberate” b’cs Australia does not have open borders and few if any get here via boats…..
so….that means that the gov(dot)au is letting them in here… with malice afore-thought…
its just another pre-text to “whittle away” the historical rights and liberties of AUssies…..
its been a down-hill ride ever since Howard proved he could “call your bluff” and dis-arm the public w/out the slightest, serious opposition
☞Sure, it’s easy to be cynical at this point but as we’ve said time and again, until the public demand access to appropriate self-defence tools this will continue to happen, no matter how much hubris and meaningless platitudes from the Police Commissioners and Police Ministers about “being safe” and “community safety” are trotted out ☜
that’ll never happen b’cs most of the public has been brain-washed by 30+ yrs of politically correct crud force-fed to them by the Fabian-inspired ‘education’ system….except for, maybe, those few thousand people lucky enough to be “home-schooled”….
as such: most people would rather be chopped up in their own homes by a gang of psych☻ home-invaders than demand that the gun laws be repealed……or….be called a “rayciss”
that’s why we need a HCA challenge to our current gun laws….
that’s why we need the SSAA to “step up to the plate” and lodge such a challenge by funding a test case all the way through the court system;
if they havn’t got the guts to do it, then, we need some-one with very deep pockets to do it….
no-one is immune from this garbage….
(of course: don’t expect any “LAFO”s to get involved…most of them are gutless cretins)
Again, calling everyone else ‘gutless’ while not doing anything yourself and putting the responsibility on everyone else and wanting a group that you believe to be controlled opposition to lodge a high court challenge.
Put up or shut up, edgelord.
i’m a pensioner…..what you want me to do, eh?
i ain’t got $millions$……
get yr LAFO m8s to do sumthin’…..
(i ain’t “holding me breath” though)
Ah, that explains it. You’re a pensioner – the generation that bent over in 1996. And now it’s everyone else’s responsibility to fix it apparently.
Still no excuse. If you care that much you should be doing something about it other than the pointless venting, which is of absolutely no risk and no benefit except to your dopamine levels.
hunh?
its youse “LAFO”s that are to blame…b’cs you prop up the current gun-grab laws and don’t have the guts to buck ’em…..
yr a part of the problem….
wht you know abt 1996-1997 any-way?
they didn’t even have the inter-webs back then….
but..typical LAFO…an ignoramus cretin!
and here we have Phantom calling people cowards and demanding that someone else fix the problem again.
OK you spineless whinger – what are you doing to change the gun laws? if it is OK for you to call others cowards for doing nothing it is certainly fair to return the favour.