It has come to our attention that Strategic Political Counsel Pty Ltd has made substantial donations to One Nation in Queensland, totalling $30,000 since November. They have made the single biggest contribution to One Nation that is currently listed in the Queensland Government’s disclosures website.
Strange, but not super unusual you might think – but it gets weird in that this company is run by a man named Michael Kauter. Kauter was previously a director for a National Party campaign, a man whose company has openly said if you want the inside track to talk to Barnaby Joyce (Deputy PM at the time) that you are best off talking to them.
To be blunt, he is a National party stooge, albeit seemingly quiet wealthy from his hard labours of lobbying. Given that, it seems strange to be donating money to his opposition in Queensland. Our insider information tells us that he hasn’t had a major falling out with his National party bed buddies, and has instead taken on the role of professional slime ball and is funnelling money for the Nats into One Nation.
Given recent news it seems only logical to guess that these funds are being used to provide a follow on donation/loan to the NSW State Branch, letting them get around the electoral disclosure laws in NSW and obfuscating the Nationals support for One Nation.
Dodgy much? Not of course to imply this is illegal, indeed as far as we can tell it is legal (but ethically dubious at best).
It shows just how scared the Nationals are of the SFFP and that they are running secret support campaigns for the extraordinarily anti-gun One Nation – a One Nation featuring such profound gun hating career gits as Mark Latham.
If you needed yet another reason to vote against the professional rot and corruption that is the Nationals (and now One Nation), look no further.
I fear that the events in NZ yesterday, whatever their true nature and I do not take lying mainstream media at face value, will make it hard to achieve any relaxation of our gun laws. Indeed, NZ PM Jacinta Ardern said that their gun laws will change, and that won’t mean being able to carry a handgun for self defence or anything like that.
I think gun control forces and the deep state have decided to treat Australia and New Zealand as one unit, since they have such intimate connections.
Look at the article about Sam Lee on this blog and the comments too.
. This from Instagram, the account for Perth of all places. Type in “Perth” on Instagram and it’s in the comments section of the first square:
“I was listening to the Christchurch shooting or whatever it was on ABC radio. A reporter named Raphael Epstein was saying that there had been reports of more than one shooter. The woman interviewing him said that the ABC was the best place to go for info because whatever was reported would be verified. Of course ultimately we need an account that is logical and matches the facts, but non-official sources are valuable precisely because they haven’t gone through the censorship ringer and therefore may contain information that is essential to knowing what happened but which might not be favourable to any official story that develops. We’ll see how keen the ABC is to remind people of reports of other shooters as the official story develops”
cocconst2019 continues:
“There is a Federal election coming up in Australia in May. Port Arthur Massacre (PAM) researcher Andrew McGregor states in the y/tube video portarthurmassacremartinbryantsetup, that there was a conference of Police Ministers in November 1995 that discussed tougher gun laws to be introduced in Australia in May 1996. By sheer coincidence, the PAM occurred in late April. This conference included Police Ministers from other countries in the southwest pacific including New Zealand. Why would New Zealand be represented at this conference if not to facilitate a coordinated approach to a civilian disarmament plan? NZ, thankfully, went its own way, but what if the Christchurch shootings are intended as another trans-Tasman disarmament scheme? NZ gun laws are still too free for the liking of George Soros et al, and if in 1996 they were hoping they could get stricter gun laws in NZ from something that happened in Oz, maybe in 2019 they’re hoping for stricter gun laws in NZ and also even stricter gun laws in Australia. The Christchurch shooting could provide the catalyst for such laws in Australia, especially since a federal election looms. The j-h-d angle could allow people who are otherwise fairly pro-gun to support tougher gun laws. ”
None of what has happened in NZ precludes another anti-gun psy-op in Australia, but as I say, they appear to be treating Australia and New Zealand as one unit.
I hope there aren’t major reverberations for Australian gun laws from all of this.
Who’s going to argue with lovely little Jacinta? She’s female and a new mother, so she knows all about what needs to be done. People are very gullible when it comes to what they get from the media and I just hope and pray this can be ridden out.